Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarlas, Ilhami Soykan
dc.contributor.authorAydogdu, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorSinangil, Ayse
dc.contributor.authorUcar, Zuhal Atan
dc.contributor.authorKoc, Yener
dc.contributor.authorSardogan, Ceyda
dc.contributor.authorAkin, Emin Baris
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-02T18:01:47Z
dc.date.available2020-12-02T18:01:47Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0041-1345
dc.identifier.issn1873-2623
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.162
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11446/3726
dc.description1st International Transplant Network Congress -- OCT 17-21, 2018 -- Antalya, TURKEYen_US
dc.descriptionAydogdu, Ibrahim/0000-0001-7900-8598; SARDOGAN, CEYDA/0000-0002-4263-3653en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000487349900018en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 31474288en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose. Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic (HARP) donor nephrectomy prevents major complications, but incision site complications may be more frequent in hand-assisted approach. We evaluated long-term incisional complication rates and cosmetic outcomes after HARP donor nephrectomy in our series. Materials and Methods. A total of 609 donors who underwent nephrectomy between February 2009 and June 2016 were invited for physical examination and face-to-face interview. A total of 209 donors (35.3%) participated to the study. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), mean follow-up period, incision-related outcomes of cosmesis, and postoperative complications were evaluated. Body image scale (BIS) and cosmetic scale (CS) (scar test) questionnaires were applied. Higher cosmesis and body image scores indicated greater satisfaction. Results. A total of 191 donors had paramedian (91.4%), and 18 donors had Pfannenstiel incision (8.6%); 121 donors were female (57.9%). the donor mean age and BMI were 49.1 (SD, 1.8) years and 29.7 (SD, 5.1), respectively. Body mass index was significantly lower in the Pfannenstiel group (P < .001). the mean BIS score was 18.9 (SD, 1.8), and the CS questionnaire score was 19.3 (SD, 4,7). the BIS score was significantly better in donors with Pfannenstiel incisions (P < .001), but there was no statistical significance in CS score. the total rate of wound infection was 4.8%, and rate of incisional hernia was 4.8%. the rate of incisional hernia was more frequent in donors with paramedian incision (5.2%), but there was no statistical significance. Six donors (2.9%) required rehospitalization because of incision site complications. Conclusion. Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy avoids intra-abdominal complications, but rate of incision site complications can be higher in hand-assisted procedure. the donors were convinced from the cosmetic outcome after HARP donor nephrectomy. the ones who had Pfannenstiel incision had better satisfaction according to BIS score.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.162en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleIncisional Complications and Cosmetic Evaluation After Hand-assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Donor Nephrectomyen_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.relation.journalTransplantation Proceedingsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDBÜen_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.volume51en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2215en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2220en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record